A transgender woman has reignited public debate after claiming she was denied medical care for a procedure related to anatomy she does not have, sparking backlash, litigation, and widespread discussion about identity and medical responsibility.
Jessica Simpson, formerly known as Jessica Yaniv, is a transgender activist from Langley, British Columbia, Canada. In 2018, she made headlines for filing human rights complaints against several estheticians who refused to provide her with intimate waxing services — specifically, a Brazilian wax. While a Brazilian typically refers to hair removal from female anatomy, Simpson, who has not undergone gender-affirming surgery, insisted that the refusal was discriminatory.
However, the estheticians, most of whom were immigrant women working from home, explained that they were neither trained nor equipped to wax male genitalia. Despite this, Simpson sought up to $15,000 in damages from each provider. The controversy reached the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal, which eventually ruled against Simpson in 2019. The court ordered her to pay $2,000 to each of the three women who testified and criticized her for showing hostility toward certain racial and cultural communities.
The estheticians, who offered services specifically for women, suffered significantly. Many had to close their businesses due to the legal stress and public attention. When questioned by a journalist from the Calgary Herald about the impact of her actions, Simpson replied unapologetically, “Why should I feel bad? I was the victim.”
Pattern of Legal Disputes
Over time, Simpson continued to file complaints and lawsuits, targeting beauty pageants, health institutions, police agencies, and even a local news outlet. A British Columbia judge referred to her as a “prolific litigant.”
In 2021, another incident drew public scrutiny when the Langley Fire Department warned Simpson after she placed over 30 non-emergency calls for assistance getting out of her bathtub. According to a letter issued to her, the fire department accused her of inappropriate behavior toward staff during those visits, calling her actions unsafe and unacceptable.
Simpson fired back on social media, threatening legal action against the township for defamation—a claim she later deleted from her profile.
Gynecology Controversy
More recently, Simpson turned her attention toward a gynecologist’s office that allegedly refused to treat her. According to Simpson, she was told directly, “We don’t serve transgender patients,” a statement she said left her “shocked, hurt, and confused.”
She posted her concerns on Instagram and Twitter, tagging the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia (CPSBC), the governing body for medical professionals in the province. Simpson insisted that gynecologists should be prepared to treat transgender patients as part of a multidisciplinary approach to care.
Although she claimed the CPSBC agreed with her stance, there have been no formal updates since the complaint was initially filed in 2019.
Public Reaction and Medical Perspective
The story continues to divide public opinion. Some argue that medical care should always align with a patient’s gender identity, while others emphasize the clinical reality: physicians must be trained and qualified to treat specific anatomical conditions.
Critics, including activist groups and commentators, have pointed out that a gynecologist’s expertise lies in treating individuals with female reproductive systems—something Simpson, who has not had gender-affirming surgery, does not possess.
Comedian Ricky Gervais weighed in satirically on social media, poking fun at the situation in his typically controversial style, which sparked even more debate online.
Medical experts, meanwhile, stress that not all doctors can or should be expected to treat anatomy they’re untrained to handle. As highlighted in professional literature, gynecological care is essential for those with specific internal organs—such as ovaries, uteruses, or cervixes—not all of which are present in all trans patients. Only those who’ve undergone reconstructive genital surgery would typically require standard gynecologic follow-up.
What’s the Real Issue?
At the heart of the debate is the balance between respecting a person’s gender identity and ensuring medical procedures are performed safely, competently, and appropriately.
As the conversation around transgender healthcare evolves, so too do questions about how far medical institutions—and individuals—must go to accommodate identity over biology.
So, what do you think? Should identity override anatomical requirements in healthcare? Or is it more important to ensure medical care is based on biological training and clinical competence?
Share your thoughts, and keep the conversation going.
Dedicated and experienced pet-related content writer with a passion for animals and a proven track record of creating engaging and informative content. Skilled in researching, writing, and editing articles that educate and inspire pet owners. Strong knowledge of animal behavior, health, and care, combined with a commitment to delivering high-quality content that resonates with audiences. Seeking to leverage writing skills and passion for pets to contribute to a dynamic and mission-driven team.